|
I love mail away stuff. I think it started when I first
saw the ad for a "Rocket Firing Boba Fett." I've collected
box tops, proofs of purchase, UPC and Flag Points. From
Crystal Skeletons to Star Wars Survival Kits, I've sent for a
ton of stuff over the years. I came across the subject of
this review and thought it unique enough to dust off and bring
to the light of day.
The 1989 "Batman" has been on my list of top 10 favorite films
for a long time. Well, for that matter, it's been on my
list since 1989. As a wee one, my favorite superhero was
Batman, and he still is to this day. I don't read much of
the newer Batman stuff on News shelves these days. I find
it just messes with my ideas of who he is, what he stands for,
and how he accomplishes his business.
I recently re-screened the 1989 version of the film when it was
on TV. I know a lot people are oohing over the "Dark
Knight," including me. However, as a film buff you have to
look at the 1989 film in context for it's time. And for
it's time, it was a pretty dark look at the caped crusader.
Consider this, the previous film version of the Joker had been
played by Cesar Romero, and played for laughs at that. The
non-comic reading public knew a Batman from a TV show that
danced and joked more than he fought crime. The ones who
didn't know him from the TV show, got their taste of Batman from
the animated "Super Friends."
Appearance:
The thing I remember the most from the first time I saw the
Tim Burton version of Batman was the visual style. It had
a very real world look to it, at least as much as could expect
from a late eighties movie. The second thing was this
Batman was getting back to his Noir roots. There's some
obvious inspirations from a variety of comics, including 1986's
"Dark Knight Returns" and "Batman: Year One." The Joker is
not quite the psycho that comic readers had seen, but he's no
Romero either. Honestly, if Jack Nicholson had played the
Joker as over the top disturbed as Heath Ledger in 1989, I can
guarantee it would have been rated R or may not have made it to
the screen at all without heavy cuts. Ironic when you
think about it, Tim Burton is normally known for surreal fantasy
environments, and yet he was responsible for bring Batman back
to a gritty real world environment more in line with a Raymond
Chandler novel than the Bat-tusi.
The reveal of the 1989 Batmobile in the film is a pretty
perfect scene. Batman and Vicki Vale racing out of the
museum, and her asking, "Which car?" The camera pans back
to show us there isn't any doubt about which car it would be.
The Batmobile in this case turn out to be a cross between
James Bond's Aston Martin, a rocket engine, and a Corvette.
It's long and mean looking. This car is meant to inspire
fear and awe as much as Batman's costume itself. Most of
the film and animated versions of Bruce Wayne's ride were at
least inspired by this car, with the "Tumbler" version in the
new film being the break from that styling.
As a model kit, the Batmobile looks just as it should.
Unlike a lot of other kits, this is one that if you didn't paint
anything, it would probably still turn out decent. There
are a number of little details on the car as well as a full
interior. You really wouldn't expect anything else for a
scale model would you?
IF memory serves correct, you can build this car with the
guns up or down. (They would come out of the panels on the tops
of the fenders.) There was also a little grappling hook
door you could option out. Mine has some light damage to
the passenger side from storage where the hook would be.
On the downside, there are two very minor things that would
have made this kit even better. The first being a more
detailed bottom side. There's no suspension and the bottom
of the car is basically one sculpted piece. The second
cool feature would have been a Batman driver. The Batwing
came with one, why wouldn't the Batmobile?
Overall, this was a fairly easy kit to get a great looking
vehicle out of. I didn't have the patience in 1989 that I
have now, so I'm sure this thing would have been a breeze to get
looking spectacular today.

Fun:
Similar to some of today's collectors clubs, Ertl offered a club
where they sent a periodical pamphlet called the Blueprinter.
I say pamphlet because if I remember right it was only about 8
pages long or so and punched for a three ring binder. In
it, they presented up coming kits, model building tips and
special offers.
I can't remember if the Batmobile Cocoon was a special offer in
Blueprinter, or you had to order Blueprinter to get it.
Either way, I couldn't pass it up in 1989.
For those of you that don't remember or haven't seen the film,
there's a scene where Batman says, "Shields" into a small
transmitter and the Batmobile armors it self. Armor plates
start popping up and covering all the sensitive areas of the
car. Based on the size and form of some of these plates,
it doesn't seem likely that the armor would really work.
However, it does make for a cool scene and cool looking
Batmobile.
In order to reproduce this look for the model, the folks at Ertl
created a vacuum formed shell to place over the finished model.
Holy instant armored crime fighting cars, Batman!
As a vac-formed piece, the detail is fairly soft when compared
to the car itself. Also, since it a shell piece intended
to fit over the car, it's obviously a bit larger than the car
itself. The vac-forming process also left a little lip all
the way around the bottom of the piece.
If I recall right, it wasn't exactly clear what you were getting
when you ordered this, or at least it wasn't in 1989. If
there was a graphic at all, it was line drawing of the movie
car.
I'm not sure if it's the armor design, the cocoon itself, or the
design of the movie armor, but the general shape of the armored
car seems more angular and not quite as smooth as the car
itself. The two shapes don't really reconcile themselves
completely, and my guess this is more from a little movie magic
than anything else.

My biggest gripe with the Cocoon was the wheels. In the
film, the wheels are covered in a very stylized way. Here
they look like wheel covers you see at RV parks. And
because the shell is bigger than the car, you can't cut them out
and have the shell look right.
I'm sure there were some modelers back in the day that used the
shell to create a kickass Batmobile. Cutting out the
armored sections and blending them all on to an actual car kit,
and then finishing it all off with some black paint. I wasn't
one of them. Besides I had a Batwing to build.
(Which I might finish one of these days.) )
Overall:
I know model kits aren't something I would
normally review, but I've been on a Batman kick. The 1989
Batmobile kit was a scale model that accurately enough represented
it's screen counter part. The cocoon, despite its' flaws, is
still a cool premium. Which would you rather get in the
mail; a Little Orphan Annie Decoder Ring or an Armored Batmobile?
Engineernerd Score: 90/100
Discuss in our forums! |